COORDINATION NORMS IN THE ESTONIAN CONSTITUTION - Наукові конференції

Вас вітає Інтернет конференція!

Вітаємо на нашому сайті

Рік заснування видання - 2014

COORDINATION NORMS IN THE ESTONIAN CONSTITUTION

02.04.2019 17:49

[Секція 1. Теорія та історія держави і права. Філософія права. Історія політичних і правових вчень]

Автор: Maxurov Aleksey Anatolyevich, Ph.D. in Law, Taras Shevchenko Kiev National University


In a sense, coordination is specified in the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (adopted at a referendum on June 28, 1992) [1] as the principle of building the entire regulatory framework.

In particular, part 1 of article 3 of the Estonian Constitution expressly states that state power is exercised only on the basis of the Constitution and laws consistent with it. At the same time, by virtue of paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the Constitution, the rights, freedoms and obligations listed in the Basic Law apply to legal entities to the extent that it is consistent with the general goals of legal entities and the essence of such rights, freedoms and duties. And on the basis of article 10 of the Constitution, the rights, freedoms and duties listed in this chapter do not exclude other rights, freedoms and obligations arising from the meaning of the Constitution or consistent with it and consistent with the principles of human dignity, social and democratic rule of law.

Coordination in Estonia is the principle of building the vertical of executive power. Thus, clause 2, paragraph 87 of the Estonian Constitution states that the Government of the Republic, among other things, directs and coordinates the activities of government agencies.

Sometimes we are talking about giving consent to specific actions (Part 1 of Article 24, Part 1 of Article 32 of the Constitution), less often - about their direct coordination. Thus, on the basis of part 2 of article 83 of the Constitution of Estonia, the Chairman of the State Assembly, in the powers of the President of the Republic, is not entitled to appoint special elections to the State Assembly without the consent of the State Court and refuse to publish laws.

Sometimes this kind of consent does not have an explicit coordination component and is only an element of the status of specific officials. For example, on the basis of article 76 of the Constitution, a member of the State Assembly enjoys immunity. He may be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice with the consent of the majority of the members of the National Assembly. Article 85 of the Estonian Constitution states that the President of the Republic can be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice with the consent of the majority of the members of the National Assembly. By virtue of Article 101 of the Constitution, a Member of the Government of the Republic may be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice with the consent of the majority of the members of the National Assembly. As follows from Article 138 of the Estonian Constitution, the State Comptroller can be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice with the consent of the majority of the members of the National Assembly. Article 145 of the Constitution establishes that the Chancellor of Justice can be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the President of the Republic with the consent of the majority of the members of the National Assembly. Article 153 of the Estonian Constitution states that, during his tenure, a judge may be brought to criminal responsibility only on the proposal of the State Court with the consent of the President of the Republic. The Chairman and members of the State Court may be held criminally liable only on the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice with the consent of the majority of the members of the State Assembly.

Literature:

1. Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (adopted by referendum on June 28, 1992) // https://www.president.ee/ru/republic-of-estonia/constitution-of-the-republic-of-estonia/



Creative Commons Attribution Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
допомога Знайшли помилку? Виділіть помилковий текст мишкою і натисніть Ctrl + Enter
Конференції

Конференції 2024

Конференції 2023

Конференції 2022

Конференції 2021

Конференції 2020

Конференції 2019

Конференції 2018

Конференції 2017

Конференції 2016

Конференції 2015

Конференції 2014

:: LEX-LINE :: Юридична лінія

Міжнародна інтернет-конференція з економіки, інформаційних систем і технологій, психології та педагогіки

Наукові конференції

Економіко-правові дискусії. Спільнота