COORDINATING NORMS IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE LITHUANIAN REPUBLIC - Scientific conference
Main page
UA RU EN

Congratulation from Internet Conference!

Hello

Рік заснування видання - 2014

COORDINATING NORMS IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE LITHUANIAN REPUBLIC

21.03.2019 19:06

[Section 1. Theory and history of state and law. Law philosophy. History of political and legal studies]

Author: Maxurov Aleksey Anatolyevich, Ph.D. in Law, Taras Shevchenko Kiev National University


Let us turn first of all to the Lithuanian legislation.

Even in the preamble to the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania (adopted by citizens of the Republic of Lithuania through a referendum on October 25, 1992) [1] there is an indication that its goal is to achieve harmony, national harmony in the land of Lithuania.

The Constitution of Lithuania has many coordination norms on the coordination of certain actions, but usually these norms are not of great importance in terms of the application of coordination as a method of legal regulation: it is banal about the necessity and (or) the procedure for obtaining consent for certain negative actions against persons with a special status.

For example, according to Article 62 of the Constitution "The person of a Member of the Seimas shall be inviolable. A Member of the Seimas may not be held criminally liable, arrested, nor may his freedom be restricted by the consent of the Seimas. In accordance with art. 100 of the Constitution, "The Prime Minister and the Ministers may not be held criminally liable, arrested or have their freedom restricted without prior consent of the Seimas, while between the sessions of the Seimas of the Republic. " Or, by virtue of Part 2 of Art. 114 of the Constitution of Lithuania, "A judge may not be held criminally liable, arrested or have his freedom restricted otherwise without the consent of the Seimas, or in the period between the sessions of the Seimas, without the consent of the President of the Republic of Lithuania.

Similarly, there are cases of "non-criminal" relocation, dismissal, and so on.

Thus, according to clause 4, part 1, article 115 of the Constitution, judges of the courts of the Republic of Lithuania are dismissed in accordance with the law, including " .

Often, through the coordination mechanism, the issue of coordinated implementation of certain politically significant actions is resolved.

For example, as follows from part 3 of Article 89 of the Constitution of Lithuania, "While temporarily substituting for the President of the Republic, the Speaker of the Seimas may either announce pre-term elections of the Seimas or dismiss Seimas. During the said period, the Seimas may not consider the issue of no-confidence in the Speaker of the Seimas.

For us, of course, the coordination standards of a deeper level, also present in the Lithuanian Constitution, are more important.

In our opinion, coordination today is one of the main principles for building the vertical of the executive branch in Lithuania.

For example, according to paragraph 3 of Article 94 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, the Government of the Republic of Lithuania shall co-ordinate the activities of the ministries and other establishments of the Government.

It should be noted that in the event of emergencies, for example, military actions, the activities of a special coordinating body are stipulated, the norms of which are constitutionally fixed.

Literature:

1. Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania // http://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=115&page=3



Creative Commons Attribution Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
допомога Знайшли помилку? Виділіть помилковий текст мишкою і натисніть Ctrl + Enter

Another articles in this section

Сonferences

Conference 2024

Conference 2023

Conference 2022

Conference 2021

Conference 2020

Conference 2019

Conference 2018

Conference 2017

Conference 2016

Conference 2015

Conference 2014

:: LEX-LINE :: Юридична лінія

Міжнародна інтернет-конференція з економіки, інформаційних систем і технологій, психології та педагогіки

Наукові конференції

Економіко-правові дискусії. Спільнота